header image about usadvertise resource guide dome store privacy policy contact us resource guide home page facebook link Follow us on Twitter
SIGN UP FOR DOME'S FREE WEEKLY E-BULLETINS  Details                                                                    September 03, 2010
Email This Post print article

Foreign Correspondent: Down the Drain

by Annie Scott
May 16, 2009

That giant sucking sound this time of year is Michigan’s infamous Brain Drain. As college graduation season ramps up, I find myself wondering how many of my fellow Mitten grads will be fortunate enough to find a job in their home state. And I wonder how many will jump into the drain to seek greener pastures outside the state lines.

According to a recent article in The Detroit News, that latter figure now stands at roughly 50 percent. The number from my alma mater in Ann Arbor is even worse at 53 percent. The News’ analysis of Census Bureau data shows a net loss of 18,000 college-educated residents in 2007. These are staggering figures considering the amount of resources the state invests in its students.

I happen to love Michigan and think it is an amazing place to live. Yet somehow, as soon as I graduated from college, I ended up getting sucked into the drain myself. Even after my tuition was paid by the MET program. I still wrestle with the guilt.

After all, I knowingly abandoned my beloved home state at a time when it desperately needed to hold on to my peers and me. It needed us to start showing a return on the state’s investment in our development. I had received a fantastic public school education and finally would have a chance to start repaying it. But I didn’t.

I could have looked harder for a job in-state. I could have resolved to stick around and get to know the non-student side of beautiful Ann Arbor. I could have fought against the tide that was sweeping up so many of my colleagues. But I didn’t.

Instead, I was selfish. I watched silently from the sidelines as herds of my college friends were wooed by Chicago-based corporate recruiters on campus. I opted out of recruiting fairs upon learning there weren’t any Michigan-based companies attending that I was even remotely interested in working for. I began to let myself be guided by my ambition to branch out and go somewhere new, where I didn’t know a soul. Somewhere that offered abundant quality career opportunities and I could take a significant risk. In short, I wanted an urban environment full of new experiences, challenges and adventures. I wanted to go somewhere new.

Ultimately, my decision was guided by two key factors: 1) the solitary decent job offer I received was based in Washington, DC; and 2) knowing full well that I would return in a few years when it came time to have a family of my own, I decided I needed to become a temporary coastal dweller in one of the fast-moving, big cities I had visited years earlier.

The steps being taken by groups as diverse as Michigan Future Inc. and Presidents Council, State Universities of Michigan and the Detroit Regional Chamber to address this widening drain are encouraging. Without a doubt, increasing the number of college graduates and creating a great many more high-quality jobs by recruiting innovative companies that attract creative, talented, young workers must be major priorities. The “Cool Cities” and “interninmichigan.com” initiatives also seem to be on the right track to reach a fair share of the drain-bound masses.

But there is another group that likely will not be reached through these efforts — those who don’t even consider staying in Michigan right out of college because their sights are set elsewhere.

As the Detroit chamber’s Patti Jones observed to the News, “how many are leaving is bad enough. What is even more disturbing is that a large percentage didn’t even look (for a job) here.”

Indeed, a significant number of my college acquaintances had no intention whatsoever of staying in Michigan. Some figured they wouldn’t be able to find a job, let alone a job they wanted, so why bother. Others figured it was time to escape the land of five-month winters. Still others were so enamored with the prospect of following their dream job — that existed only in their dream city — that it was the only option. One-third of the grads who left Michigan in 2007 reportedly had job offers in the state but fled anyway.

That’s the group I’m most interested in — the ones who don’t even consider staying because they either think they can’t find what they want in Michigan or are wholly focused on wanting something beyond the Mitten’s borders. At least for a few years.

So how can the state keep that group from leaving? Quite simply, it can’t. I can make up all the excuses I want, but the fact is I knew I wanted to live in other places before settling back down in Michigan. Nothing would have changed my course.

So, instead of focusing solely on preventing young professionals from leaving, it’s just as important to zero in on providing incentives for those who have left to return to Michigan, enriched by the skills, knowledge and experience they have gained “abroad.” To encourage them to come back to the place that prepared them for their future and that’s working hard to redesign its own, more promising future.

The MichAgain program holds promise, but funding has been elusive. Similar to a thus-far successful program called Generation Iowa that distributes mailings and newsletters to keep public university grads in the loop wherever they are, MichAgain could be a step in the right direction. But much more could be done, especially once more new jobs are available. Giving people who have already fled down the drain a reason to come back could have significant benefits for everyone.

A number of my friends and I still want to move back to Michigan in a few years, once we have finished exploring and learning lessons from people with different backgrounds and experiences. We’re not deserters. And we’re not waiting for Michigan’s economy to suddenly turn golden and unemployment to disappear. We’re just waiting for the right opportunity.

Annie Scott lives and works in San Diego and sends dispatches back to her beloved Michigan.

Tags: Foreign Correspondent

4 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Rob Bacigalupi // May 22, 2009 at 8:35 am

    Annie:

    Very important topic! The programs you mention are important, but not as much as fixing the base problem: better cities. Michigan college grads are going to continue to look elsewhere as long as Michigan can’t offer great cities to give them that “fast moving, big city” experience you spoke of. Michigan needs to deal with its substandard cities, and the sprawl that helps degrade them, in order to keep and attract talent.

  • 2 Christy // May 26, 2009 at 5:58 am

    Even more important than creating “cool” cities (an initiative famoulsy touted by the governor), the focus should be on creating economic growth in Michigan. If jobs are available in a variety of fields more students will be willing to stay in state. I left Michigan for college, and every time I think about going back I wonder — but what kind of job could I have there? Efforts like the one to build a green energy industry are on the right track in terms of their potential to attract and keep highly educated talent in the state. Ambitious folks are looking for places where they can have successful careers — not just cool places to go out at night.

  • 3 Andrew // May 27, 2009 at 11:57 am

    My own college graduate children are leaving the state only because there is little opportunity for them here. Good jobs are important but I hesitate to urge them to rely on the green energy movement because that is driven by government and excessive hype. Energy is an infrastructure industry like roads and rail – providing necessary inputs to other businesses. It won’t matter much if there is no industry left to consume energy.

  • 4 Don Weeks // Jun 12, 2009 at 5:37 am

    Annie Scott, with her ears and mind wide open, has shed more light on the topic of brain drain than the numerous studies and surveys over the decades. Her first- and second-person accounts are very telling and fascinating. She’s a good writer, too.

    All of this hand-wringing is somewhat useful—we do want to improve career prospects for college grads and all job-seekers. But the fact of life is that Michigan does not, and never has and probably never will, provide the “vibrant city” experience that these young, idealistic future-of-the-world folks desire.

    Our biggest city is in sad decline; our second biggest city is kind of boring (in the eyes if grads); our capital city is, of course, dominated by government.

    For reasons best left to other areas of study, we do not have a Chicago, New York City, Seattle or Los Angeles here in Michigan. These are the exciting environs sought by young people looking for “cool cities.” You can’t just slap that label on some Michigan city and make it so.

    The other side of this coin is the draw that Michigan has on the people who grew up here, which Annie also mentioned. I contend that most people who grew up in Michigan, and went elsewhere to find work when they were in their 20’s and 30’s, will return in their 40’s and 50’s to start or relocate their own businesses. If you’ve experienced the lakes, the north, the U.P., you will long for this while listening to the traffic noise in Baltimore or looking at the flat, treeless landscape of west Texas.

    Yes, let’s do all we can to provide opportunities for people who want to work in Michigan. But let’s also be realistic and devote these efforts where we have the best chance of success. Build on what we have; don’t waste time and money building phony facades.

Leave a Comment:

Be sure to put in the security words and hit SUBMIT

*Required

(does not appear on post) * Required