<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michigan’s Hypothetical Congressional Districts after Redistricting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domemagazine.com/blogs/redistricting/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domemagazine.com/blogs</link>
	<description>Michigan People, Politics, and Policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb O'Kelly</title>
		<link>http://domemagazine.com/blogs/redistricting#comment-5875</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb O'Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domemagazine.com/blogs/?page_id=1150#comment-5875</guid>
		<description>Looks very logical! Had to be two incumbents competing--am I right that this would be Kildee and Rogers? And of course, other districts will be competitive with the new constituents.

Thanks, Craig!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks very logical! Had to be two incumbents competing&#8211;am I right that this would be Kildee and Rogers? And of course, other districts will be competitive with the new constituents.</p>
<p>Thanks, Craig!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn Ochberg</title>
		<link>http://domemagazine.com/blogs/redistricting#comment-3960</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Ochberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domemagazine.com/blogs/?page_id=1150#comment-3960</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;d love to be in Shauer;s district instead of Roger&#039;s, the better to defeat the embarrassing Walberg. I hope your Ingham County proposal succeeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;d love to be in Shauer;s district instead of Roger&#8217;s, the better to defeat the embarrassing Walberg. I hope your Ingham County proposal succeeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Map?</title>
		<link>http://domemagazine.com/blogs/redistricting#comment-3835</link>
		<dc:creator>Map?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domemagazine.com/blogs/?page_id=1150#comment-3835</guid>
		<description>Could someone produce a graphical map of these districts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could someone produce a graphical map of these districts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia McCollough</title>
		<link>http://domemagazine.com/blogs/redistricting#comment-3796</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia McCollough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domemagazine.com/blogs/?page_id=1150#comment-3796</guid>
		<description>I remember all too well when district lines were still up in the  air come filing time, and Burton Leland wound up filing in two districts.....way back when? 

Interesting analysis  Craig, can&#039;t wait to see how it all shapes up.   Thanks  for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember all too well when district lines were still up in the  air come filing time, and Burton Leland wound up filing in two districts&#8230;..way back when? </p>
<p>Interesting analysis  Craig, can&#8217;t wait to see how it all shapes up.   Thanks  for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

