February 10, 2012 rss
header twitter link facebook link home link
Sign Up For Weekly E-BulletinsView Resource Guide and Job Postings

Craig's Grist

The Ivins’ Test

Buster Keaton, Laurel and Hardy, and Lucille Ball created hysterically funny chaos out of solving problems. Politicians occasionally transcend the comedic genre.

I derive a test of political slapstick from the late Molly Ivins, the acidic, left-wing observer of Austin’s shenanigans. It’s the Ivins’ Test.

In the 1990s, Texas legislators awoke to a headline heralding that Texas was the first state in modern times in which gun fatalities exceeded traffic fatalities.

Red-faced state legislators mulled it over for a day or so. In a collective “aha” moment, they found the solution: raise speed limits.

It worked like a charm. Pathways to progress are seemingly endless. Traffic fatalities rose. Gun fatalities stayed constant. Embarrassing problem solved.

Three years ago, Oakland County Executive L. Brooks Paterson engineered an initiative to repeal Michigan’s Single Business Tax. State legislators, in “aha” moments, blessed the curse. Later that year, they cursed the blessing, enacting a new business tax that left every employer befuddled and pissed off.

The Patterson repeal of the Single Business Tax met the Ivins’ Test. Like Buster, Stan, Oliver, and Lucy, Brooks came, saw, conquered, and rued.

I especially revel in high jinks from brilliant minds in other locales.

Pittsburgh’s brilliant mayor, Luke Ravenstahl, young and full of statewide ambition to do good, proposed closing the city’s budget gap by imposing upon students in its 10 colleges and universities (the only things going for Steel City) a 1-percent tax on their tuition.

We turn to Arnold, who governs California, for a corollary. He announces that he will lead a petition to amend the constitution of the “something for nothing” state to assure that the state never pays more for corrections than it does for higher education. In Michigan, we’ve done that for a decade, presuming that it’s a great investment. We might try here for a constitutional amendment that requires future policy makers to never invest less money for college students than peers in correctional bodies.

Governor Paterson’s prescription for that which ails Albany is term limits. As The New York Times’ dependably insipid editorial writers coach, “that’s a particularly seductive idea since most legislators only leave office if they retire, die, or go to jail.” The faint praise is noteworthy from the New York press.

Close to home, Governor Granholm professes now to be Michigan’s champion for entrepreneurs. She has dissed them in public policies for a decade, preferring groundbreakings for firms getting her Michigan Economic Development Corporation’s largesse behind “old economy” employers of a few hundred workers.

It is time to call out the comedians in politics.

Clowns make us laugh. Clowns in politics make us shudder.

Craig Ruff is, among many things, a senior policy fellow and former president of Lansing-based Public Sector Consultants.

April 18, 2010 · Filed under Craig's Grist Tags: , , ,

7 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Stuart Filler // Apr 21, 2010 at 3:11 am

    IT’S “IVENS,” ISN’T IT?

  • 2 Kelly Raskauskas // Apr 21, 2010 at 3:48 am

    It’s “Ivins.”

  • 3 Kelly Raskauskas // Apr 21, 2010 at 3:50 am

    and it’s “faint praise,” not “feint praise”…

  • 4 Editor // Apr 21, 2010 at 6:55 am

    Mistakes were made!

    Seriously, thanks for pointing out the errors so they could be corrected.

  • 5 Maxine Berman // Apr 21, 2010 at 10:21 am

    And for a little history, let’s not forget Ivins’ most famous comment in reference to a member of the Texas legislature: “If he got any dumber, they’d have to water him.” So incensed was the water-needing legislator that he called Ivins’ newspaper and demanded a retraction. In response, the paper took out large billboards all over town saying “Molly Ivins can’t say that, can she?” And “Molly Ivins Can’t Say That” became the title of her first book.

  • 6 Craig Ruff // Apr 21, 2010 at 5:37 pm

    The pull-out mistakeningly and innocently cited “Ivans.” The late, great Ivins will sleep well because we got it right everywhere else. She probably doesn’t give a tinker’s dam (or damn) anyway.

    As to faint versus feint praise, it is “feint.” I blew it. It violates the “i” before “e” rule, but so does reign. Worse yet, I fail the Bill Safire test of phrase-checking. Apologies.

    With such gifted readers, I have to be more careful.

    If a good friend elects to share his Austin stories on this site (not cite), he will win over more converts to the inanity that was and is Texan politics.

    Domeites (another “i” before “e” or “e” before “i” problem) are most discerning. Mollie (not Molly) and I appreciate your editing.

    As I try to decipher the encoded words allowing me to weigh (or wiegh) in, I recall Dorothy Parker’s insciption on her tombstone: If you can read this, you’re standing too close.

    Cheers, Craig
    Cheers

  • 7 Mike Ranville // Apr 26, 2010 at 12:49 pm

    Great piece, Craig. Molly Ivins was one of the greatest. I was fortunate enough to be placed at the same table with her and Andy Rooney at the John Henry Faulk dinner – an annual celebration of the first amendment – in Austin a few years ago. Neither disappointed. What a night. She would, I’m sure, be happy with your well-crafted, well researched article. And to the surprise of no one, a Craig Ruff article on Molly Ivins attracted the quality pen of Maxine Berman for a comment. Going to have go some to top this week, buddy.

    Mike Ranville

Leave a Comment:

Be sure to put in the security words and hit SUBMIT

*Required

(does not appear on post) * Required

 

Advertisment

Advertisment

Advertisment

Advertisment

Advertisment

Advertisment
© 2007-2011 DomeMagazine.com. All rights reserved. Site design by Kimberly Hopkins, khopdesign, llc.