February 10, 2012 rss
header twitter link facebook link home link
Sign Up For Weekly E-BulletinsView Resource Guide and Job Postings

Craig's Grist

The Power of the Visual

Dear Reader: In my own selfish interest in escaping bodily harm, I wish to apologize in advance for failing to mention in this essay some of your favorite “big” Michigan places and visible phenomena. Space constraints and all that. But think about your favorites and their inestimable value and keep these pictures in your mind during the 2010 political season.

In the movie Sunset Boulevard, actor Bill Holden suddenly recognizes the woman played by his co-star, Gloria Swanson, as a silent film actress. “You used to be big,” he says. She sneers, “I am big. It’s the pictures that got small.”

In Michigan, it’s the attitude that got small. The pictures still are big.

Let’s start by envisioning the very shape of the state: it’s unique — even recognizable from outer space, for heaven’s sake!

We boast six great water crossings, each an engineering marvel: the Mackinac, Blue Water, Ambassador, and Sault Ste. Marie International bridges, the Canadian National Railway train tunnel under the St. Clair River at Port Huron and the Detroit-Windsor Tunnel.

Another “big” is The Henry Ford; the museum and Greenfield Village rank at the very top of America’s historical attractions.

The Meijer, Cranbrook, and other gardens showcase the botanical and sculptural arts, and the landscaping of Michigan State University and Belle Isle meld the work of man to the glory of nature.

Such natural marvels as Isle Royale, Sleeping Bear Dunes, Saginaw and Traverse bays, the Great Lakes coastlines, our inland lakes and rivers, and the Irish Hills need not man to add to their wealth but rather man’s scrupulous attention to their care.

As for our cultural treasures, don’t get me going on the craven destruction of many of our beautiful, old movie theaters, but we did save the Fox in Detroit, the Temple in Saginaw, the State in Traverse City, the Michigan in Ann Arbor, and others. Moreover, a number of the state’s smaller municipalities have rescued their opera houses from neglect and given them new life; Calumet’s and Traverse City’s particularly shine today, and Howell’s will be a gem when restoration is complete.

We have performance halls unmatched anywhere, such as Hill Auditorium in Ann Arbor and the Music Hall in Detroit. And the Detroit Institute of Art holds its own with the top art museums of the world.

Then there are our sports venues. Not for nothing is the University of Michigan football stadium known countrywide as “The Big House.”

We don’t take a back seat in architecture, either. Our stately, 19th century libraries, courthouses, churches, and homes stand beside more contemporary achievements such as Grand Valley’s downtown Grand Rapids campus, homes designed by Frank Lloyd Wright and Eero Saarinen, and commercial buildings created by Albert Kahn, Louis Kamper, and John Portman.

I posit that any vision for Michigan must include the visual. In part, that means protecting culture (man’s gift to man) and nature (God’s gift to man). It also means creating new works: things we can see, things we can visit.

To support my point, I suggest that people do not go places to see other people. The 45 million annual visitors to Paris are there to see the Eiffel Tower, Champs-Élysée, Arc de Triomphe, the Tuileries, the Louvre, the Musée d’Orsay and the Seine (not snotty maitre d’s at restaurants endowed with stars ranging from zero to four).

Michigan is not France. None of its cities is Paris. Nonetheless, pride in our place, to say nothing of tourist dollars, is essential to human wellbeing.

In a shocking rejection of the notion that the presence of poverty precludes accomplishing great things, Franklin Roosevelt created the Works Progress Administration, with the result that nearly every community in the country had a park, bridge, or school constructed through the agency, or an arts, drama, media, or literacy project funded by the WPA. Many are extant.

Compare this to the myopic and slavishly self-indulgent purposes of the current federal stimulus boondoggle. In Michigan and the United States, we’ve rejected trying to accomplish great things as incidental, even harmful, to lifting people out of poverty.

There is plenty of evidence (including the community conversations, conducted by the Center for Michigan, involving more than 10,000 Michiganians) that having pride in our place matters to us just as much pride in their place matters to the French and the Parisians. The Uniroyal giant tire is not the Eiffel Tower, but then the Eiffel is not everybody’s cup of tea. (The author of a book about the tower’s history and construction noted that she daily would see a Parisian sitting beneath the tower. After several days, she asked the man why he spent so much time lounging underneath it. He replied, “It’s the only goddamned place in Paris where you don’t have to see it!”)

We all know that any poll about the state’s problems will show that the populace is most concerned about jobs and the economy. But let’s probe a bit. To what end is a job? In this age most jobs have a shelf life of a few years at best. Are any of us creating something that will even be around, much less admired, in 25 years? 100? 1,000?

You will send this essay into the ether with a keystroke, but if I had been a steelworker on the Mighty Mac (fat chance, with my fear of heights), my soldering job would endure. It would contribute to the thrill you get when you catch sight of the bridge and to the support of your journey across it.

I wonder whether society can survive economically primarily on services. New York City, Chicago, and Los Angeles apparently do, but exchanging services is a relatively new concept in economic growth. For thousands of years, the business of man has been goods — inventing them, producing them, and trading them.

It’s all well and good for people to philosophize or run workshops preaching that brainpower has displaced brawn. But it’s a mite shallow to think that what you do with a brain necessarily will outlast what someone else does with brawn. You can take the money and run if you create the iPod application that will cause a stampede at merchandisers’ doors this December. Or you can bend and fold metal, pour concrete, and weld in constructing something that will outlive you and this year’s gadget by a century or more.

Michigan needs a big attitude. It needs big projects. It needs vision beyond making next year’s budget balance. We need dreamers and builders to pull us out of our petty squabbles over less and less. Keep this in mind: Chicago is not called the “Windy City” because of high winds. It was so named by people on the east coast when the city’s zealous, civic hound dogs bloviated so much to win the World Exposition of 1893.

I don’t care whether a single, monumental project costs Michigan $10 billion or whether 100 or 1,000 smaller projects set us back the same amount. I look into the eyes of the fiscal pragmatists and ask where in the history books their names will be mentioned. You do not earn glory for pinching a penny. You earn it for commissioning a Michelangelo or building the Mighty Mac.

In our nearsightedness we have lost a decade. It looks as if we will lose another. Will the best that we can say in 2021 is that we added some private boxes to the Wolverines’ football stadium? Or built a superfluous bridge from Detroit to Windsor?

Michigan’s current state of mind is to hunker down. Our leaders have dumbed us down. They have deflated dreams. They pander to our anxiety. They would rather we build windmills than gifts to posterity.

In this political season, I — like everyone else — will fall in line with customary political gamesmanship. I’ll ask candidates if they support or oppose the supplemental business tax, right to work, higher standards for student achievement, and reining in prison costs.

What I’d really like to do is to grab candidates by the scruff of the neck, lead them to a big, blank piece of paper, and tell them to draw Michigan’s future. I say, if you can’t envision visually, you can’t lead. Who we are is not about what we eat, where we shop, or what we pay in taxes for a gallon of gas.

Who we are is all about what we build and preserve.


Craig Ruff is, among many things, a senior policy fellow and former president of Lansing-based Public Sector Consultants.

May 16, 2010 · Filed under Craig's Grist Tags: , , ,

8 responses so far ↓

  • 1 tom // May 18, 2010 at 1:37 am

    Craig
    A thoughtful and beautiful picture you paint for us all to see.
    Where is the artist to help us create a shared vision and common agenda for a new Michigan?
    Perhaps, as you suggest, the one that helps create the most beautiful picture wins.
    Well done.

  • 2 Kim // May 18, 2010 at 4:33 am

    Great article Craig! You got the “inner-activist” in me fired up. We are drowning in the mundane and insignificant these days. I think you should rename your column “Ruff’s Scruff”….

  • 3 Chuck Fellows // May 18, 2010 at 5:04 am

    Craig,

    One thing you left out – Michigan’s everyday people are showing us how to leave the doomsday pundits behind. It’s part of their DNA. Your perspective on Michigan shows it. Michigan’s people are doing it.

    That blank piece of paper becomes a kaleidoscope of diversity embracing all that you have mentioned and an economy that is full of energy from agriculture, tourism, manufacturing and most important – individual citizens creating micro enterprises. Yeah, we have a growing service industry too!

    Watch closely as that ‘blank’ piece of paper becomes a Diego Rivera of much broader scope.

    The auto industry – especially Ford labor and management – has not given up. The people that work there have hung tough and are showing the world that we don’t give up. And how about turning that Rouge Industrial complex into a wildlife habitat, in the same place that pioneered the world’s first theme park and hotel airport tourist destination. (In the spirit of full disclosure, I’m a Ford retiree , just a little bias for the Alma Mater).

    We have the ability to become a leader in education, especially early education and (we are already there in higher education). There is a true Renaissance taking place in the Detroit Schools, early education leading edge innovation at the Shiawassee Great Start program (under the radar but fantastic), Kalamazoo (got the Presidents attention) and many other efforts around the state. All demonstrations of administrators, individual teachers, students and parents ignoring all the political fluff and focusing on kids and their families learning – despite the micromanagement of top heavy bureaucracy.

    We have local communities collaborating to provide services, somehow overcoming the statutory barriers stand patters like to whine about and doing it without he intervention of a higher power. Elected locals, clerks, analysts, inspectors, cops and firefighters, the people that make the health, general welfare and public safety in government work.

    The Center for Michigan (one man’s mission, thank you Phil!) has shown that the people who do the work and pay the taxes want to invest in education, especially early education.

    Do not forget those whose efforts are masked by the blowhards and thin thinkers – the legislators who are quietly struggling to bring about positive change against rather large odds – they understand and live the phrase “elected and serving.”

    Michigan has challenges, and those are good things. Our problems are really no more than opportunities in work clothes. And Michiganders have a history of getting to work. We are not very windy, we just get it done.

  • 4 robert marans // May 18, 2010 at 5:50 am

    Nice article. You’re overview of Michigan’s treasures is good but you left out a real gem.

    The metropark system is SE Michigan (HCMA) is one of the best in the world and a model or what regional cooperation can do.

  • 5 Gus Breymann // May 21, 2010 at 5:53 am

    So the next step should be to figure out how we enact a vision and a sense of our place among Michigan’s political leaders. One concrete step would be to restrict gubernatorial debates to a single question: What’s your vision of this state and how would you bring it about if elected?

  • 6 George Moroz // May 21, 2010 at 7:21 am

    Craig,

    Thanks for the kind mention of The Henry Ford as one of Michigan’s “bigs.” We have strategically committed to help Michigan reclaim its once envied global identity as a center for innovation, possibility and opportunity. In so doing, we intend to be more than Michigan’s leading cultural tourism destination; we have commited to being an active catalytic force for fueling a new spirit of American innovation and inspiring a “can-do” culture. I invite you and all of the Dome’s readers to see how we are attempting to do that at the grassroots level by hosting the midwest’s first interation of Maker Faire (July 31 and Aug 1), a new signature event for our institution, our region and our state. It will celebrate and promote what has long been a part of the Michigander DNA: creative making, innovation, invention and entrepreneurialism. Those should also be what one “sees” when one visualizes what Michigan has been, and again, can be.

  • 7 Susan McGillicuddy // May 21, 2010 at 5:29 pm

    Would it be possible to get the entire legislature to create a “vision” for our state and have all the departments aim in that direction? Just think how much we could accomplish! Imagine our park lands (forests) were connected with off road trails so those camping or bicycling/walking could travel to another entity without going out on a highway to get to the destination. What would our cities look like with large squares filled with fountains, shops and people? Imagine watching a sculptor working through a front window, or taking a gondola ride in the Grand River. Ride a trolley into town to meet up with a friend and shop?

    Of course we need diversity of labor as well as jobs or we would end up with a monoculture just like we had.

    Michigan is a great state, we have everything. It is a garden of a state with beauty all around. Just open your eyes and take in the view.

    Thanks for your thoughtful article Craig.

  • 8 Matt S // May 21, 2010 at 6:38 pm

    The government can’t do anything efficiently, other than make tax dollars disappear. But if you are dead set on a tax payer funded boondoggle, I say let’s have the best roads in the world. Let’s have the best rail system in the world.

    Let’s make it easy for citizens and business to travel and transport their products.

    Maybe our fine universities could produce something practical, like a design for a road that will last more than one summer…

Leave a Comment:

Be sure to put in the security words and hit SUBMIT

*Required

(does not appear on post) * Required

 

Advertisment

Advertisment

Advertisment

Advertisment

Advertisment

Advertisment
© 2007-2011 DomeMagazine.com. All rights reserved. Site design by Kimberly Hopkins, khopdesign, llc.