April 26, 2018 rss
header twitter link facebook link home link
View Resource Guide and Job Postings

Lawrence Glazer
Lawrence M. Glazer

Scholars Explore Michigan Supreme Court Upheaval

February 20, 2011

The Michigan Supreme Court has attracted increasing scrutiny from the press and public in recent years. Much of this attention has been provoked by the huge campaign expenditures for election to the court; by the increasing bitterness between former Justice Elizabeth Weaver and her fellow Republican-nominated colleagues; and by a growing perception of partisan or ideological division between blocs of justices (for examples, see recent Dome columns by Jack Lessenberry “Crusading for Court Reform” and “Evidence Mounts for Judicial Reform” and “Shaking Up Michigan Courts”).

Even William Whitbeck, current judge and former chief judge of the Michigan Court of Appeals (whose affiliation was Republican before joining that court), expressed his dismay recently, saying, “It is little wonder that the court has, of late, consisted of two separate camps that correspond, not coincidentally, with the political affiliations of the justices. And it is no wonder at all, given their political importance, that the political parties and their often anonymously funded outriders spend millions upon Supreme Court elections.”

All of these controversies have come to the attention of the public. What has been less noticed is evidence relating to the substance of the Supreme Court’s recent work

A University of Chicago Law School study in May 2008 reviewed each state’s highest court’s actions from 1998 through 2000 (which includes the first two years of Michigan’s conservative majority), and graded each one on three measures:

  • Productivity, defined as the number of opinions issued per judge per year;
  • Influence on other states’ courts, defined as the number of opinions by other states’ highest courts in which an opinion of the subject court was cited (e.g., how many times an opinion of the Michigan Supreme Court was cited with approval in an opinion issued by another state’s highest court); and
  • Independence from partisan preferences in deciding cases, defined as the number of opposing opinions written, by the judge of interest, against a judge of the opposite party, divided by the number of opposing opinions written against a judge of either party.

The results:

  • In productivity, the Michigan Supreme Court ranked near the bottom: 40th of 44 courts for which data were available.
  • In influence the Michigan Supreme Court again ranked low, 42nd out of 52 courts studied (two states have separate supreme courts for criminal and civil appeals, thus the total is higher than 50).
  • Most significantly, in independence the Michigan Supreme Court was ranked 52nd of 52 courts — dead last.

The authors’ methods of measuring productivity, influence and independence are, of course, subject to dispute. What is indisputable, though, is that the Michigan Supreme Court’s conservative majority for most of the past 12 years has drastically changed the court’s approach to following the rules established by previous decisions, or precedents (formally known in law as stare decisis, usually translated as “let the decision stand”).

No matter how well drafted a legislative statute is, questions which the legislature never anticipated will arise over time. For example, if one statute provides that you must bring a lawsuit within three years of the event in a case of wrongful death, and another statute provides that you must bring a lawsuit within five years of the event in a case of medical malpractice, which statute applies to a case of wrongful death caused by medical malpractice? Such questions can only be answered by the courts.

Over the years, the courts’ answers to such questions become the accepted “body of law,” which institutions and individuals rely upon in making investments and planning their affairs so as to avoid potential legal liabilities. Such reliance is based on the assumption that the extant body of law, though it may be extended or limited from time to time, will essentially continue to govern our affairs.

A dramatic example of changing established law was the Court’s decision in the 2000 case of Nawrocki v. Macomb County Road Commission. For many years it had been settled law in Michigan that state and local governments’ duty to maintain public roads reasonably safe for travel included the duty to keep signage in reasonably good condition, for obvious reasons. In other words, if a stop sign fell down and the local government had notice of it and failed to fix it, that government was liable for an injury to a motorist caused by the lack of the stop sign.

As a result, all local governments made sure to keep stop signs in good repair and visible, and motorists naturally came to rely on this. In the Nawrocki decision, the conservative majority overturned that interpretation of the governmental immunity statute, ruling that because the statute did not expressly mention signage as an exception to governmental immunity, the legislature must have intended to exclude such cases.

The U.S. Supreme Court and virtually all state appellate courts follow the stare decisis principle. Even when they believe that a prior case was wrongly decided, they will not overrule it unless “related principles of law have so far developed as to have left the old rule no more than a remnant of abandoned doctrine, or…facts have so changed, or come to be seen so differently, as to have robbed the old rule of significant application or justification” (so said the U.S. high court in its decision in Planned Parenthood of S.E. Pennsylvania v. Casey).

But when the conservative Republicans gained a majority in 1999, they changed the meaning of stare decisis in Michigan. Since then they have overruled the court’s previous decisions whenever they have determined that the previous case was “wrongly decided.” You might think that correcting the previous decisions would involve merely technical issues, and indeed that is what the conservative majority said it was doing in most of the cases. But according to legal scholars, every single one of these “corrections” changed existing law in the same direction: erecting barriers to enforcing individual rights against businesses and governments.

The Michigan Court majority’s attitude toward precedent has caught the attention of scholars, and has been analyzed in two articles, “Stare Decisis v. The ‘New Authority’: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Practice Of Overruling Precedent, 1998-2002,” in the Albany Law Review in March 2003; and “The Michigan Supreme Court, Stare Decisis, And Overruling The Overrulings,” by Wayne State University Professor Robert A. Sedler (Wayne State University Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 09-28, December 8, 2009).

Sedler examined the Michigan Supreme Court’s decisions from 1999 (when a conservative Republican majority was first seated) to 2008. He found that during that period the court had overruled 38 of its prior decisions, in contrast to the previous 10-year period 1989–1998, in which the court had overruled only eight prior decisions.

Moreover, Sedler found that in every overruling decision involving a civil case, the new ruling favored defendants over plaintiffs, and in every criminal case the new ruling favored the prosecutor. He concluded that “a majority of the justices…have used their power…in order to make significant changes in Michigan’s tort law in favor of defendants over plaintiffs…in workers compensation law in favor of employers over workers, and significant changes in criminal law in favor of prosecutors over defendants.”

Prof. Sedler is a former general counsel to the ACLU of Kentucky, and this will no doubt cause some to charge him with bias. However, New York attorney Sarah K. Delaney reviewed the Michigan court’s decisions from 1998–2002 and reached virtually the same conclusions as Sedler.

Reviewing a smaller set of decisions than Sedler, and making a justice-by-justice analysis, Delaney concluded that the conservative majority “has determined what decision they desire to reach, and when a previous opinion bars them from so holding, they rely on the argument that the previous court interpreted a statute incorrectly.”

None of these scholarly critiques is the final word, but together they do add weight to the argument that it is time for reform in our Supreme Court.

Lawrence M. Glazer is the author of Wounded Warrior, a recently published biography of former governor and Supreme Court justice John Swainson. He is also a retired Ingham County Circuit Court Judge and former legal advisor to Gov. James J. Blanchard.

February 20, 2011 · Filed under Glazer Tags: , , , ,

77 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Libertarian1 // Feb 21, 2011 at 3:53 pm

    Judge Glazer

    Your article about the rulings in Michigan is one opponents of some SCOTUS decisions have also given.

    Each time it seems liberal justices have abandoned stare decisis to make progressive rulings and then expected future conservative justices to obey their new precedents. Brown v Board, Miranda, Lawrence, Bakke/Grutter etc.

    In the future when more liberal justices return to majority do you expect them to exercise stare decisis and to follow the conservative precedents set by the current court? Or is stare decisis one way only?

  • 2 Michigan Lawyer // Feb 26, 2011 at 3:25 pm


    Your comment reminds me of when 2 third graders argue with each other. By the end of the argument they are both saying “I know you are, but what am I.”

    Does it bother you in the slightest that every single decision favored the same interests? I thought the judiciary was supposed to be independent rather than an extension of a political party or economic interest.

    It seems Of the People, By the People and For the People has been transformed into Of the Monied Corporations, By the Monied Corporations and For the Monied Corporations, but I guess you are good with that.

  • 3 Our Fall Schedule « Progressive Women of Charlevoix County // Sep 9, 2012 at 4:25 pm

    […] Dan is committed to reforming the Michigan Supreme Court after years of watching the Republican majority change laws in order to deny Michigan residents access to the court and to gut consumer protection laws and environmental regulations.   See the attached article on more information on our current Supreme Court:  http://domemagazine.com/glazer/lg0211. […]

  • 4 catenacycling.com/en/my-catena/my-blog/detail/358 // Mar 4, 2014 at 4:21 pm

    4. Nike has evolved applause from worldwide as its concern of the international clientele. The makers have realized the nuances of world brands in the processing of Air Max shoesand tried to implement to the best with their own abilities.
    catenacycling.com/en/my-catena/my-blog/detail/358 http://catenacycling.com/en/my-catena/my-blog/detail/358

  • 5 Cheap Famous hats snapbacks china // Mar 6, 2014 at 4:22 am

    A vehicle Number one wood Many perks Why It can be profitable A person A lot, By any means, That you can Possess a Excellent Gas mileage

  • 6 Polaris Parts // Mar 8, 2014 at 7:56 am

    518793 693680really good post, i undoubtedly adore this wonderful web site, carry on it 329060

  • 7 caricabatterie camper vendita online // Mar 8, 2014 at 9:55 am

    194447 609503hi there, your site is discount. Me thank you for do the job 584991

  • 8 cheap jordans online // Mar 9, 2014 at 3:25 am

    Nice post. I find out some thing a lot more difficult on different blogs everyday. It’ll normally be stimulating to read content from other writers and practice somewhat something from their store. I’d prefer to make use of some using the content on my weblog no matter if you don’t mind. Natually I’ll provide you with a link on your web blog. Thanks for sharing.
    cheap jordans online http://watchesccoi.teenblog.com/post/276480/air_jordan_renowned_line_from.html

  • 9 jordan 11 greys // Mar 9, 2014 at 3:25 am

    The next time I read a blog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as considerably as this 1. I mean, I know it was my option to read, but I really thought youd have something interesting to say. All I hear is actually a bunch of whining about something that you could fix for those who werent too busy looking for attention.
    jordan 11 greys http://www.freewebsite-service.com/rolexwatcheszqe/Blog.php?id=160963&snavn=Nike+Air+Jordan+Is+Ideal+For+Persons

  • 10 cheap jordans // Mar 9, 2014 at 3:25 am

    Nice post. I understand some thing far more challenging on several blogs everyday. It is going to normally be stimulating to read content from other writers and practice just a little some thing from their store. I’d prefer to make use of some using the content on my weblog whether or not you don’t mind. Natually I’ll provide you with a link on your internet blog. Thanks for sharing.
    cheap jordans http://www.trueblueandwhite.com/blog/view/29170/affordable-jordan-shoes-which-offers-your-heart-a-additional-robust-workout-jordan-basketball-shoes1138

  • 11 jordans outlet // Mar 9, 2014 at 3:25 am

    When I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now each and every time a comment is added I get four emails with the identical comment. Is there any way it is easy to eliminate me from that service? Thanks!
    jordans outlet http://funsocialsite.com/blogs/post/2288

  • 12 cheapest jordans // Mar 9, 2014 at 3:26 am

    There are surely numerous details like that to take into consideration. Which is an excellent point to bring up. I supply the thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly you’ll find questions like the one you bring up exactly where essentially the most critical thing will probably be working in honest decent faith. I don?t know if preferred practices have emerged around issues like that, but I am certain that your job is clearly identified as a fair game. Both boys and girls really feel the impact of just a moment’s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.
    cheapest jordans http://www.indyarocks.com/blog/1495205/Michael-Jordan-Quotes-To-Inspire-You

  • 13 cheapest jordans // Mar 9, 2014 at 3:26 am

    I’m normally to blogging and i genuinely appreciate your content. The post has honestly peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your internet site and maintain checking for new specifics.
    cheapest jordans http://www.flixya.com/blog/5619056/Your-very-best-option-is-air-Jordan-footwear

  • 14 jordans for cheap // Mar 9, 2014 at 3:26 am

    Hello! I just would like to give a huge thumbs up for the awesome info you might have here on this post. I will be coming back to your blog for more soon.
    jordans for cheap http://ameblo.jp/jordanscoo/entry-11710566067.html

  • 15 jordan shoes // Mar 9, 2014 at 3:26 am

    Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read something like this prior to. So nice to uncover somebody with some original thoughts on this topic. realy thank you for beginning this up. this website is something that’s needed on the internet, someone having a small originality. valuable job for bringing something new to the net!
    jordan shoes http://partydressshops.com/really-low-priced-jordans-tips-on-how-to-encounter-quite-affordable-jordans-on-the-net/

  • 16 jordans for cheap // Mar 9, 2014 at 3:27 am

    you might have a terrific weblog here! would you like to create some invite posts on my blog?
    jordans for cheap http://funsocialsite.com/blogs/post/1775

  • 17 shoes jordans // Mar 9, 2014 at 3:27 am

    I’m impressed, I have to say. Truly rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you might have hit the nail on the head. Your concept is outstanding; the issue is something that not sufficient folks are speaking intelligently about. I am particularly pleased that I stumbled across this in my search for something relating to this.
    shoes jordans http://partydressshops.com/jordan-shoes-stylish-shoes/

  • 18 jordans outlet // Mar 9, 2014 at 3:27 am

    Your location is valueble for me. Thanks!
    jordans outlet http://partydressshops.com/loctite-go2-glue-assessment/

  • 19 jordans for cheap // Mar 9, 2014 at 3:28 am

    There’s noticeably a bundle to understand about this. I assume you created certain nice points in capabilities also.
    jordans for cheap http://www.nexopia.com/users/watchesccoi/blog/4-inexpensive-jordan-shoes-by-way-of-developing-a-volume-of

  • 20 animal control nj // Mar 9, 2014 at 5:38 pm

    37000 898920Some really good articles on this website , thankyou for contribution. 800416

  • 21 play bonus slots // Mar 10, 2014 at 12:16 pm

    275080 650078I dugg some of you post as I thought they were really beneficial invaluable 573915

  • 22 slot machines play free online // Mar 10, 2014 at 12:45 pm

    59118 559382My wife style of bogus body art were being quite unsafe. Mother worked with gun very first, right after which they your lover snuck free of charge upon an tattoo ink ink. I was positive the fact just about every need to not be epidermal, due towards the tattoo ink could be attracted from the entire body. make an own temporary tattoo 425561

  • 23 penny stocks // Mar 11, 2014 at 3:25 pm

    153662 512365whoa, this is a truly great piece of info. I read about something like this before, this is impressively fantastic stuff. 646385

  • 24 hidemyass pro // Mar 11, 2014 at 11:16 pm

    NSaKrrmW February 14, 2014 at 3:24 pm

  • 25 turbulence training scam // Mar 12, 2014 at 9:20 am

    828642 629308hey was just seeing if you minded a comment. i like your site and the theme you picked is super. I will be back. 55630

  • 26 photographer mesa az // Mar 12, 2014 at 7:09 pm

    159636 577407The website loading pace is amazing. 65151

  • 27 vimeo.com/87665235 // Mar 13, 2014 at 6:38 am

    848546 767815We are a group of volunteers and opening a new system in our community. Your internet internet site given us with valuable data to function on. You

  • 28 nike air max 1 // Mar 13, 2014 at 7:32 pm

    Scholars Explore Michigan Supreme Court Upheaval | DomeMagazine.com
    nike air max 1 http://www.associationpetitange.com/chaussures/

  • 29 Learn More // Mar 14, 2014 at 9:26 am

    F*ckin¡¯ remarkable issues here. I¡¯m very glad to peer your post. Thank you a lot and i am having a look forward to contact you. Will you kindly drop me a mail?



© 2007-2011 DomeMagazine.com. All rights reserved. Site design by Kimberly Hopkins, khopdesign, llc.