April 25, 2018 rss
header twitter link facebook link home link
View Resource Guide and Job Postings

Columns
Jack Lessenberry

Jack Lessenberry

Tax Cuts and Jobs

November 17, 2017

EAST LANSING, MI – Very few things are certain in life, except for the fact that we are all mortal — and that every new Republican administration will have a tax “reform” plan.

But what would the current one, which House Republicans call the “Tax Cuts and Jobs” bill, mean for Michigan?

According to one leading expert on the state’s economy, virtually nothing good. “The first thing to say is that we shouldn’t even be talking about a tax cut now, with the economy at or near full employment,” said Charles Ballard, professor of economics at Michigan State University.

Ballard, a past chair of the department and the author of the well-reviewed book Michigan’s Economic Future: A New Look, isn’t against stimulating the economy when needed. He strongly approved when that was done during the Great Recession back in 2009.

But now, he says, with unemployment in the state barely above four percent, “there is very little room for a fiscal stimulus to speed up the growth rate. There just isn’t a big reservoir of unemployed workers,” to put back to work.

What he fears cutting taxes might actually do instead is speed up the next recession. That could happen, he explained, if an overstimulated economy started raising worries about rising inflation levels. That “could lead to the Federal Reserve to step on the brakes more than they otherwise would have,” by raising interest rates to head off soaring prices.

“From a macroeconomic perspective, I think this is just bad policy,” Ballard said. He cheerfully conceded, however, that predicting long-term economic trends is very difficult.

But what he felt much more comfortable about was predicting its effects on individuals. Naturally, the tax plan’s features are not set in stone. There are differences between the House and Senate versions, for one thing.

Amendments are almost certain as the legislative process carries forward. But Republicans do have firm control of all branches of government, and the proposal’s broad outlines are clear and unlikely to change much.

“The tax plan has lots of bells and whistles, but the central organizing principal is to tilt tax policy in favor of those with high incomes – especially if the incomes come from ownership of businesses – and/or high wealth,” the economist said.

Asked for an example, he said “compare the effect on two married couples, both of which get all their income from wages and salaries.” Married Couple A has taxable income of a million dollars a year. Married Couple B makes $40,000 between them.”

How would they fare under the Trump-endorsed tax plan? The millionaire couple would get an annual tax cut of $29,000.

The poorer couple would see their taxes rise by about $800. That’s just a rough calculation. In fact, the tax plan calls for an increase in some things that would help the poorer couple, including the standard deduction and the child tax credit.

As a result, Ballard admitted that “many families of average means would not see a tax increase” at all.

But he added “The notion that this is tilted towards average incomes is ridiculous. We should also remember that this would do even less for the poor or for many lower-middle income families.”

The way to dramatically help those folks is clear, he said: increase the Earned Income Tax Credit, the famous EITC that has been proven to help the working poor.

Unfortunately, there’s nothing in either version of the GOP tax bill to beef up the EITC, or expand the poor of those eligible.

There is, however, lots of evidence that the GOP plan would drastically increase the national debt – and that is a matter of concern for economist Ballard.

The national debt took from the Declaration of Independence in 1776 to 1969 to reach a trillion dollars. Today, it is $20.4 trillion, and rising. “The official budget documents estimate that the gross federal debt will reach $23.6 billion by 2022,” Ballard said. The Trump-favored tax bill “is estimated to add on another $1.5 trillion.

“I am concerned about the amount of debt we are leaving to our children and grandchildren,” the economist said.

The debt increase, however, could spell serious trouble for the fate of the GOP tax plan. Under the rules of the U.S. Senate, bills which the Congressional Budget Office analysts believe would increase the deficit in the long term need at least 60 votes to pass.

But there are only 52 Republican senators – and it is inconceivable that any Democrats would support this tax plan as it now stands. Unless the Senate suspends its rules – or makes major changes to this bill, it is hard to imagine the “tax cuts and jobs” bill ever reaching the President’s desk.

But both parties also know that in politics, you never say never. For proof, consider what happened in the presidential election last year.

Jack Lessenberry is the head of journalism at Wayne State University, serves as Michigan Radio’s senior political analyst and writes regularly for several publications. He also serves as The Toledo Blade’s writing coach and ombudsman and is host of the weekly television show Deadline Now on WGTE-TV in Toledo.

November 13, 2017 · Filed under Jack Lessenberry


Advertisment


Advertisment


© 2007-2011 DomeMagazine.com. All rights reserved. Site design by Kimberly Hopkins, khopdesign, llc.