Greater Economic Efficiency and Benefits for the Affluent

By on March 19th, 2011

Cover Story
Photo

Greater Economic Efficiency and Benefits for the Affluent

Weekly Updateby Charles L. Ballard
March 19, 2011

Before Rick Snyder took office as governor, the people of Michigan knew a few things about him. We knew he had used intellect and hard work to take himself from modest beginnings to a multi-million-dollar fortune. We knew he wanted to make Michigan a friendlier place for businesses. But many details remained to be filled in.

Nothing fills in the details like a budget proposal. His budget proposal, issued on February 17, gives us a much clearer picture of Governor Snyder’s values, priorities, and style.

Governor Snyder is an accountant and an executive. Accountants and executives, like economists, like things to be streamlined and efficient. The desire for efficiency is one of the hallmarks of Snyder’s tax-policy proposals. For example, the proposal to eliminate the Michigan Business Tax will move us toward a simpler system of business taxation. It is also a move toward a more “level playing field” among different sectors of the economy.

Similarly, the proposal to tax some retirement income will create a more level playing field between retirement income and income from working. Yet another idea in this vein is the proposal to limit some of the special tax breaks that have been handed out to businesses. This would reduce our unfortunate tendency to have high taxes on some businesses along with subsidies for others.

If passed into law, these proposals would allow us to collect some of our tax revenues more efficiently than we do now. I will discuss some shortcomings of Snyder’s tax proposals below. But if we just focus on the economic-efficiency aspects, Gov. Snyder’s proposed tax policies look pretty decent.

These tax proposals also make clear that Gov. Snyder is not afraid to tackle big challenges in a bold way. Lots of folks have said they want to eliminate the surcharge in the Michigan Business Tax. Snyder trumped that, by proposing to eliminate the MBT entirely.

The proposal to tax certain types of retirement income is even bolder. In American politics, no cow is more sacred than our exceptionally generous treatment of the affluent elderly. It’s easy to understand the politics of this — well-to-do old folks are more likely to vote than other groups in the population. But our policies toward the affluent elderly are very hard to justify on economic grounds.

I applaud the governor’s courage in taking on this issue. Michigan’s seniors make net payments of less than zero in the state income tax. The revenue loss from these tax laws is pushing toward $1 billion per year. As our population gets older, the revenue losses get larger every year.

It would be OK if the legislature modified Gov. Snyder’s proposal in order to provide some additional protections for low-income seniors. But most of the tax breaks in today’s tax system go to seniors who are not poor. It would be a crime if the legislature rejects the entire proposal.

Although Gov. Snyder’s proposal would increase the taxes paid by affluent retirees, most other parts of the budget proposal are quite friendly to those at the top of the income scale. Thus, in addition to revealing a penchant for efficiency and a willingness to act boldly, the Snyder budget also reveals a lot about the governor’s views toward income inequality.

In Michigan, as in the U.S. as a whole, the biggest economic story of the last 35 years is the phenomenal increase in income inequality. The college-educated upper middle class has done very well. The income and wealth of CEOs and others at the very, very top have increased to an extent that is unprecedented in human history. But many folks who fall below the median income are little better off than those who were below the median in the 1970s.

Against this background, Gov. Snyder proposes to allow the income tax rate to drop from 4.35 percent to 4.25 percent, thus costing the state another $150 million per year. Most of the resulting tax reductions will accrue to high-income households. (To his credit, Snyder says he wants to stop there, and not allow the scheduled decrease to 3.9 percent.)

Gov. Snyder also proposes large reductions in education funding. These cuts also tilt in favor of the affluent. Those at the top of the income scale can more easily afford to send their children to private schools and universities. If they do send their children to public institutions, the affluent can more easily offset K-12 program reductions by providing enrichment activities outside of school. They are also better able to absorb the tuition increases that are the result of dwindling state support for higher education.

Moreover, although the proposed reduction in business taxes would help create a more efficient tax system, a large chunk of the immediate benefits of the business tax cuts will be received by affluent people. Also, the budget proposal does not touch the mother of all inefficiencies in our tax system — the non-taxation of services and entertainments in the sales tax. Large parts of the untaxed services and entertainments are purchased by affluent folks.

The percentage of the economy going into the state’s coffers was lower in 2010 than in 2000, by the equivalent of about $9 billion per year. This helps to put the $1.8 billion deficit into perspective. If we had avoided even a small fraction of the tax reductions of the last 10 years, we would not have any budget deficit at all. Most of the tax reductions have benefited affluent residents. If the tax cuts received by affluent Michigan residents had been just a little smaller, there would be much less pressure to cut funding for education, or to eliminate the EITC.

Thus, one of the most persistent themes of the budget proposal is that Gov. Snyder appears to be willing to accept the degree of inequality that we have now, even after one-third of a century of massive increases in income inequality. To the extent that he is not fully comfortable with the current degree of inequality, his proposals appear to indicate that he is willing to accept some further widening of the gap between rich and poor.

Read previous article in cover story >> | Read next article in cover story >>

Charles L. Ballard is professor of economics at Michigan State University and director of the State of the State Survey in MSU’s Institute for Public Policy and Social Research. His books include Michigan at the Millennium and Michigan’s Economic Future.

8
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
8 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
Click Webpagechiverhidemyass procanadian solar companycheap true religion jeans Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Susan Moriarty
Guest
Susan Moriarty

Good set of articles here. I like the new Governor and think he does have a sound vision of where Michigan needs to go. I think the affluent elderly have not been carrying their fair share and they need to. I also think we should tax services and lower the sales tax a tad. I’m not optimistic that CEOs and business leaders will invest in Michigan. Their history has been to skim the cream off the top of the economy and hoard it for themselves. I think our education system would be better served (and our children) with weaker teacher… Read more »

cal1942
Guest
cal1942

Mr. Ballard, Ms. Moriarity; with all due respect, you’re both way off the mark. First, Snyder’s plan taxes all pensions without regard to the amount. That’s the huge flaw in a flat rate income tax. Many retired people get by on small pensions of a few hundred a month plus Social Security. Hardly what anyone would call affluence. Even retired people with good pensions aren’t necessarily affluent and today many retired people, because of the weak national economy are giving financial assistance to their working children and grandchildren. If Snyder wants effective reform the place to start is working to… Read more »

Cheap christian louboutin
Guest

It’s a attractive piece of content,i recommend the application.
Cheap christian louboutin

cheap true religion jeans
Guest

How to chooose christian louboutin flats
cheap true religion jeans

canadian solar company
Guest

934556 671441As I web site possessor I believe the content matter here is rattling fantastic , appreciate it for your efforts. You should keep it up forever! Good Luck. 719547

hidemyass pro
Guest

I happen to be writing to make you understand what a nice discovery my wife’s princess developed reading through your web page. She even learned some pieces, which include what it is like to possess an ideal coaching mindset to let other individuals without problems fully grasp a number of very confusing matters. You actually surpassed people’s desires. Thank you for distributing the effective, trusted, explanatory as well as fun tips about that topic to Evelyn.

chiver
Guest

Helpful information. Blessed me personally I came across your internet site unintentionally, for amazed exactly why this chance didn’t taken place beforehand! My partner and i saved the idea.

Click Webpage
Guest

Have you seen Steans?I just some time ago started getting more visitors to my site by simply submitting my site to different web directories.


Dome Magazine © 2022

Web Design by Douglas Marketing Group