The Secret Campaign Contribution Shell Game

By on July 11th, 2013

Columns
Jack Lessenberry
Jack Lessenberry

The Secret Campaign Contribution Shell Game

July 12, 2013
LANSING, Mich. – Those who fought for years to try and limit the effects of money over our elections were dealt what seemed a fatal blow three and a half years ago. That’s when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it was an unconstitutional limit on free speech to place any restrictions on corporate or, for that matter, union spending on elections. No matter how much money is spent, no matter how close to the election received, and no matter how outrageous the ads.
That was the famous Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision, which was decided on a 5 to 4 vote. But often overlooked is the fact that the court also indicated that states could, and indeed should, require anyone trying to influence campaigns to disclose how much is being spent, and by whom.
Yet Michigan doesn’t even do that.
That’s something that outrages and motivates Rich Robinson, who for years has run something called the Michigan Campaign Finance Network, (www.mcfn.org) a non-profit, non-partisan research center dedicated to documenting how much money is spent to try and influence elections…and where it comes from. Late last month, Robinson released a massive report called “ Descending Into Dark Money: A Citizen’s Guide to Michigan Campaign Finance 2012,” which attempts to chronicle spending in virtually every federal and state race this past year.
The report, which is filled with tables listing who gave what to whom, shows—as you might expect—a new record in contributions last year. But what is most ominous is that more and more of that spending can’t be accounted for, because it is so-called “issue advertising” done by sometimes shadowy groups. This has become particularly acute in judicial campaigns, especially for the Michigan Supreme Court. There, the parties and candidates spent $5 million dollars, the sources of which can be traced.
But that was vastly overshadowed by $13.85 million in “issue-oriented” TV advertising that can’t be.
“There is no public record of whose contributions paid for the issue advertising,” Robinson said, something he finds outrageous. “Citizens should have the right to know whose money is driving critically important election outcomes, so they can evaluate how campaign spending correlates,” to what politicians actually do, he said. For example, if a politician voted to relax fuel emission standards, shouldn’t people have the right to know whether an auto manufacturer gave money to her or his campaign?
The way it now stands, maybe not.
Legally, anyone could form a committee called “Citizens for Happy Kittens” and take money from the Koch brothers, or, say, the Socialist Workers Party. Then they could run ads smearing the record of some judge running for re-election. As long as such a group doesn’t actively endorse a candidate, they don’t have to disclose where their money comes from. Ironically, that seems to run directly contrary to the intent of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Citizens United case. In his latest “Dark Money” report, Robinson quotes approvingly from the majority opinion: “The First Amendment protects political speech, and disclosure permits citizens and shareholders to react to the speech of corporate entities in a proper way. This transparency enables the electorate to make informed decisions.”
One could argue that, since there often is not enough time for harried voters to find out who sponsored a particular ad, such “informed decisions” are out of reach. But reality, Robinson noted, is what we have to work with. “I don’t believe there will be a time in the foreseeable future when there will be any restraints on spending,” he told me. “For that reason, I think it critical that we achieve authentic, rigorous disclosure of whose money is driving politics.” He knows that some rich contributors don’t want to be disclosed. “They consider disclosure to be intimidation and a threat to freedom of association,” he said.
Indeed, some groups have cited a famous civil rights case, NAACP v. Alabama (1958) in support of not requiring disclosure. In that case, in which a racist government was attempting to drive the civil rights organization out of the state, the high court ruled the state did not have a right to their membership list. “That is a preposterous equivalence,” Robinson snorted. “An angry billionaire who doesn’t want his fingerprints visible on his political spending is nothing like a civil rights worker in the Jim Crow south, and not deserving of the same protection—anonymity—afforded to someone at risk of being lynched.”
Rich Robinson knows that the chance of Michigan’s GOP-dominated legislature passing a law requiring disclosure is dim. But the campaign finance specialist thinks the legal profession should ask for a ruling from Secretary of State Ruth Johnson that the use of anonymous, issue-oriented ads in judicial races is illegal. He doesn’t think you can ever make the case for legal “issue-oriented” ads in a judicial campaign for one simple reason: “It is illegal to lobby judges. Once we achieve transparency in judicial campaigns, it will be much harder to justify in legislative and executive campaigns,” he said.
So that leaves the ball in the lawyers’ hands.
To check out the full report, and to see what money may have influenced any Michigan official, go to www.mcfn.org.
Veteran journalist and national Emmy Award winner Jack Lessenberry teaches at Wayne State University, serves as Michigan Radio’s senior political analyst and writes regularly for several publications. He also serves as The Toledo Blade’s writing coach and ombudsman and is host of the weekly television show Deadline Now on WGTE-TV in Toledo.

Jack Lessenberry

Jack Lessenberry, the longtime head of journalism at Wayne State University, can be heard on his podcast on YouTube via the Zing Media Network. He also is a winner of a National Emmy Award for a 1994 Frontline documentary on Dr. Jack Kevorkian, has served as The Toledo Blade’s writing coach and ombudsman and is now a columnist for and a  consultant to both that newspaper and Block Communications, Inc. He is also the co-author of “The People’s Lawyer,” a biography of Frank Kelley, the nation’s longest-serving attorney general, and is working on a book on a pioneering newspaper family and race.

Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Anagnorisis
Guest

It’s all Orwellian. Citizens United has not the least thing to do with citizens; it only unites corporations with their favored candidates. Issue advertising is tantamount to the Ministry of Love in 1984. It’s all roundabout workaround tactics: pass a law restraining something; pass another law sustaining it. Like the 1st Amendment superseded by the Treason Act subsequently repealed, the rhetorical continuum continues to waste time and money. Jack gets it right; the boondoggle is unending, lawyers and lobbyists do the moneychangers’ bidding – the only real winners here.

Stephen Linder
Guest

I have issued many challenges and requests to Rich Robinson to release the list of his donors. Crickets. This story is filled with so many mis-applications of the law, terminology, compliance, that it boggles the mind. Extremely sloppy journalism. The fact of the matter is, Rich and others ultimately just want to shut us up and have government funded speech: welfare for politicians. The public, and any part of it, has a right to speak out. They don’t have the ink that a Jack Lessenberry has from his corporate subsidized media outlets. We have to use our own money to… Read more »

solar panels toronto
Guest

32079 432272It is rare knowledgeable folks within this subject, nevertheless, you appear like there

article source
Guest

15216 566280Music began playing any time I opened this site, so frustrating! 676629

iphone 5s
Guest

600942 502549Cool post thanks! We believe your articles are fantastic and hope much more soon. We adore anything to do with word games/word play. 604631

iphone 5s
Guest

33283 402357The vacation trades offered are evaluated a variety of in the chosen and merely great value all around the world. Those hostels are normally based towards households which you

play online roulette
Guest

35015 139860Hello! I

online slots free no download
Guest

531016 456981Come across back yard garden unusual periods of one

local moving and storage companies
Guest

177184 60233It

Chandler Az
Guest

180497 64761This design is steller! You certainly know how to keep a reader entertained. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (nicely, almost

Hidemyass Pro
Guest

Wonderfull great site effexor xr withdrawal/newborn ethically troubling, he/she may refuse to assist the preceptor in medication distribution to patients

best online casino
Guest

782147 169715of course like your web-site nevertheless you require to check the spelling on quite a couple of of your posts. Numerous them are rife with spelling issues and I to discover it extremely bothersome to inform the reality nevertheless I

Breakthrough Sleep Apnea Treatment That WORKS
Guest

518819 948283Wohh exactly what I was looking for, regards for putting up. 387713

megasesso
Guest

684151 978517Read more on that Post.Useful info. 505634

blogging
Guest

614170 730516Should you happen to excited about eco items, sometimes be tough shock to anyone them recognise that to assist make special baskets just for this quite liquids carry basic steps liters associated ceiling fan oil producing. dc free of charge mommy weblog giveaways family trip home gardening home power wash baby laundry detergent 69694

how to create my own website
Guest

770726 31768Hmm is anyone else experiencing issues with the images on this blog loading? I

Get More Information
Guest

Valuable information. Lucky me I found your web site by accident, and I am shocked why this accident didn’t happened earlier! I bookmarked it.


Dome Magazine © 2021

Web Design by Douglas Marketing Group